Ma, some BMR chat now...Razor claimed yesterday that dilution is now accepted as an inevitability...so why is there so little debate about how big this will be? How much do they need to raise 10,12,14m? What level 1.5, 1.75, 2p? We've seen so much speculation about asset values, production plans, partners etc that has been quite ridiculous, but the dilution is reality, so why be so worried about discussing it?
Listen MA, I know that you're not the sharpest tool in the box, but I will say it one more time...when you can answer questions as prolifically as the ask them, then I can engage with you. Until then, what would be the point?
As I've said to you before MA when you post as 'rolex' if you want people to answer your questions, you have to occasionally answer those put to you as well
MA, any chance of answering my 'rolex' question?
MA, why do you sometimes post as 'MA' and at other times...'rolex'? Doesn't make much sense to me...
Harlequin (I know you read my posts here), as the purveyor of misleading claims, I would have guessed that you would have excellent insight as to "what possible reason did MA mislead us"!
Hey Ted, I see you bottled out of the challenge yesterday 
Razor claimed yesterday that dilution is now accepted as an inevitability...so why is there so little debate about how big this will be? How much do they need to raise 10,12,14m? What level 1.5, 1.75, 2p? We've seen so much speculation about asset values, production plans, partners etc that has been quite ridiculous, but the dilution is reality, so why be so worried about discussing it?
Good morning...I'm really surprised that Harlequin has the nerve to post on LSE after his bizarre series of claims made in December were proven to be fictitious...it is up to others to decide if he was deliberately aiming to mislead people.