View
Page
Yoyo - I understand your frustration, but Breezy is spot on. A yes vote would have diluted private investors to oblivion and only kept the company going another 6 months at best. The only people to have benefited would be the directors who could draw their salaries a little longer. I've lost over £30k on this puppy and close to £45k in total so few people wanted this to succeed more than myself and Breezy. BHR would have need massive cash injections on top of the dilution and still weren't forecast to ship coal until quarter 3 of 2016 - they would never have got there. A sad state of affairs I know, but the NO vote was the right thing to do. Equate it to putting a lame dog to sleep!
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
Latest from the Community...
