Pipeline Hot air going through there pipeline or 2 bbls/d of pure water. This company has been a disaster and would not expect to much from the latest news.
PANTHEON RESOURCES panr TAKEOVER TALK USA [link]
SP Angel reaffirms its accumulate investment rating on Pantheon Resources PLC (LONANR) and set its price target at 52p. [link]
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources PANR… XXXXX Sold that top up of just six days ago back @ 17.40 it is showing a rise of 6% this time i was correct in thinking that was to low. The sell shows as a buy on history that can not be trusted on shares like these .
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources PANR… XXXXX Topped up 15.40p thought it was year low but see here 14.85p August 7th .
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources Hi Ripley I got shot of most of them but still hold a few showing an 80% loss. I bought as high as 183p! I note they’ve crept back up to circa 18p now. They sit alongside PMG- another oily disaster area showing me a loss of more than 70%. I think I’ve had my fill of small AIM miners and oilies!!! - SEY was another huge disappointment after many patient years of holding on I shook myself free a while ago.
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources PANR… XXXXX My avatar not showing against this tread. RNS This morning Share Prophets news say “pre-placing ramp” . Was 16p at one point.
Unmitigated Disaster! Maybe there was a clue in the COE name ??
#PANR #PANTHEON #RESOURCES The Times article on BP Jay Cheatham, CEO of beleaguered AIM-quoted oil exploration company Pantheon Resources, today received the backing of the company’s second-largest individual shareholder. [link] …
[link] Pantheon Resources (LONANR) – Sound Approach: we believe its decision making has improved.
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources PANR… xxxxxxx Sold the last top up 5th July @ 17.5p back @ 19p ( had it in mind and alert @ 18.5 ) But noticed after my sell there is good news apparently today ( RNS , and lse chat on it ) Main reason is i had missed the fact that i topped up on 11th April 2018 @ 20p , plus had not seen Malcy change of thought on it 3rd July ( he removed from his bucket list ) I do hope Malcy is trustworthy and not pushing his own book.
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources PANR… XXXXX Just watch a clip from Malcy ( 3rd July lse )hes gone off this one and now thinks investors should of cut losses . He removed it from his “bucket list.”
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources What i experience bowman is when you put in the company tag ( your example panr ) It shows up other things were those words happen to be mentioned . Certain BB that i had left comments on are not there anymore. An example Gemfelds which was taken over by a south African company last year . The old notes/ messages were useful to refer to .
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources I am unsure, from your formulation, if you have understood me correctly. So I will show step by step what I meant. When you are on a particular thread click on you avatar, see red arrow. panr 1.png1084x83 24.3 KB Then click on your name, see red arrow. The click on “Activity”, see red arrow. panr 3.png1084x189 27.6 KB Finally click on magnifying glass and enter Company code, see red arrows. Here the "Search posts by box is ticked by default, but check that it is, see green arrow. You will then get a list of your posts the particular Company discussion board. If the list is long there is an entry at the bottom of the displayed list that says “See more”, click that and you will see the entire list in descending data order. With regard to the old vs new discussion, I find the discussion section of the new infinitely better, but it is a pity that the “Research” side of it is currently only a rather poor imitation of what was there before. Notwithstanding that I like the new discussion section better, there are still bugs to be fixed and some improvements that need to be implemented. Progress on the “free” side of this site is slowed by the necessity to concentrate on the trading side first. The allocation of posts to Companies and categories is done by the User who establishes the thread. I have noticed many time posts under “General” that are obviously discussing a particular Company, but the User who posted it did not fill out all the relevant boxes. There is little that ii can do about it since they are not clairvoyant. In general if a thread has been given a tag (Company allocation) then this appears at the top of the page in a small grey field. Unfortunately the new site, exactly the same as the old one, cannot prevent Users from putting general discussions (e.g. Brexit) under a particular Company tag. This is also the case of rants about the new site, that should not be entered against a Company tag but should be entered under the “Site Feedback” category.
NEW ARTICLE: The Oil Man: Pantheon Resources No need to aplogies bowman i thank you for trying to help. Yes i sussed how to look down the threads but my little " avater " i have learnt what its called on this site now was not showing against any other thread. I found the old site much better you ? It does not go back very far and to look at old posts is slow. When you not on a certain share but looking at general discussion you have no idea what share they are disusing before clicking on reading and messing about further.