Thomas Tallis
14 Mar 2016
Vote up People who have been wrong get voted up - I have been right and I get hardly any votes up.What a load of delude id1ots there are on this board.
Thomas Tallis
14 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at leas... "I've just got very fed up with it all and decided it's time to move on." - without an apology for the things I've said on here.
Thomas Tallis
14 Mar 2016
Numpty I don't read her posts, but I'll bet the princess still believes in this one.
Thomas Tallis
14 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at leas... "I eventually decided enough was enough " - you could have decided that much sooner if you had listened to me."I could be completely wrong ..." - yes, that sounds right.What's your opinion of MW now after that article about Viviani and other rubbish?There's one born every minute.
Thomas Tallis
14 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at leas... He could have said all that in fewer words - "I was wrong, TT was right".
Nick Rev
07 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at leas... I'm a much smaller holder now than I have been. Having lost a huge amount of money through this and believing the "Spin".I eventually decided enough was enough when Lee Clayton left the Board. The only reason I stayed as long was that I totally believed in him. He brought some good people with him to the table.Lee was and is the only way they were ever going to turn this around, but with the debt as it is and the Directors attitudes I cannot see how this will happen. I don't honestly believe that anyone there in charge has a clue.With the Oxford Capital Ltd. borrowings how could they ever manage to defend the IP? Should someone unauthorised take up the process then they would have to go to court. They could never afford to do so. Oxford Capital Ltd. have both saved and murdered the Company. So an indefensible IP means they have 7/10ths of nothing.The best (in my opinion) that can be hoped for is that someone buys the company. But again with the debt why would you? Better to just pick up the IP and run with it.I still own millions of the things, so I have a very long face with this.Truly I had huge hopes here, but the misrepresentation of what was happening by the Directors has led us all astray and cost us dearly. Promises, innuendo and soothing words have all been used to cause a screen of constant failure and disappointment.As I say I like, respect and believe in Clayton, but the rest I wouldn't employ.This is my own opinion. I would suggest you all should make your own decisions and question the Board as to the future. I could be completely wrong and be reading things in a way that they are not, but I've just got very fed up with it all and decided it's time to move on.
nipper22
06 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at leas... Agreed. There have been other contributers giving reasoned opinions over the years but most don't bother any more. To explain the reason would take first prize for stating the blindingly obvious.
Thomas Tallis
01 Mar 2016
News, or lack of it. On the ERT "Update" page -"04 August 2015Update on Earth Enterprises (trading as Waste-Not-Recycling)Since the licence agreement was signed with Earth Enterprises in February this year our new US licensee has made great progress in the building of their PIM plant.The installation of the oven, mould system and the fully automated robotics is now complete. They are currently programming the robots prior to the commissioning of the plant...."They are showing the usual atittude to keeping us informed. They kept us in the dark for ages before we were told that the Chinese deal had fallen through. Is it possible that something has gone wrong here?With any other company I would think that getting this far - "installation of the oven, mould system and the fully automated robotics is now complete" - was pretty conclusive that everything is on-going, but with ERT - ?
ImpartialOpinion
01 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at leas... Look at your posts over the last year and advise if you ever mention anything of value or interest. Surely its about time you talk about the Chinese deal again or waiting a bit longer. Its just so tedious. Same posts over and over again. Nick rev was just about the only person that provided reasoned analysis. Where are you nick?
Thomas Tallis
01 Mar 2016
Re: Worth 10 x the current value at least.. The sp is down by ar least 30% since someone posted "Worth 10 x the current value at least".Look at the chart of the sp over the last five years - see if you can spot a trend!
Thomas Tallis
29 Feb 2016
Tom W's target price - 0.0p Zero. Trade today at 0.06p - moving closer to my forecast of 0.05p.Will Tom W be right?If we wait just "a little longer" we will find out.Is that what you meant by "a little longer" dief?
Thomas Tallis
18 Feb 2016
This had a Bid of 0.05p today. Will 0.05p soon be the Ask?
Thomas Tallis
18 Feb 2016
Re: Market mover - 0.05p !!! "Up 36% since my last post." - the sort of coment we get from someone wearing rose tinted specs.One site shows a Bid today of 0.05p - guess who was right?.I said it months ago - when did the cheerleaders ever give an opnion that turned out to be right?I got a load of stick for my comments but over the years, my opinions have been right more than anyone else on here.
dave297
16 Feb 2016
Re: Surviving ? I view today's news of an increase in the possibility that ENRT will survive,for now.Why bother converting your debt to equity right now if the company is about to go into Admin.Perhaps Brooks converted now as part of a tidying up process ahead of the oft hinted reverse takeover
Thomas Tallis
16 Feb 2016
Wow, GREAT NEWS ! ! ! Please excuse the sarcastic headline.The debt conversion does seem to me to be a sign of confidence that I wish Clayton had shown and we must hope that it is a sign that he knows good things are on the way. However, I said in a recent post that this company has made me give up hope and it will take a lot more than this to make me post "GREAT NEWS ! ! !" and mean it.As for up 36% - those blips mean nothing, let me know when the sp is back to 3p.Where are the cheerleaders - still waiting just a little longer before they come back on here?
