scotchoverice
11 Apr 2015
..Though BMR will be producing concentrates not zinc or lead for delivery..at least that's what MA said...
Schadenfreude
09 Apr 2015
Re: BMR Stream Log You're not wrong Bugle! Remember all the claims that massive IIs were "being clever" by spreading their holdings around to hide their true intentions (probably in the same place that Masoud was hiding all of his RNSs that were waiting for the market to pick up for release). It's almost like some people were out to deceive others with lies, deception, intimidation, and distortion...quite, quite disgusting, but perhaps the chickens will come home to roost at some point.
Bugle
08 Apr 2015
Wasn't another reason for viewing the share register to show that there were NO, NONE, ZERO, ZILCH ii's anywhere near the 3% threshold. I am sure someone on LSE kept telling that board there were many ii's just below the threshold. It seems they were telling downright lies. I wonder why that may have been.
Schadenfreude
08 Apr 2015
Bully boys are regrouping I see! Goodness me Scotch, I see that the ramping team have regrouped and have you in the cross-hairs 
Have they really learned nothing?
This clearly has nothing to do with BMR Watch and everything to do with the fact that one or two of the "I've never sold a share"/"just topped up with another £10k" brigade have been found out to have nothing like the holdings they claimed on the boards. Their agenda is clear for all to see.
Certain dodgy Walter Mitty characters have no sense of right and wrong...I remember too well the bullying and harrassment of posters such as that Welsh Postman on iii (can't remember his name) who after challenging the hype was subject to his pictures, address and wife's details being put up for ridicule.
Do you still think that there are investors who believe this team after all that has gone on?
The LSE Ramping Team: outraged by everything, ashamed of nothing.
scotchoverice
08 Apr 2015
But if anyone is interested in RRR..."WHO ARE IPCM?
scotchoverice
08 Apr 2015
If anyone wishes to discuss RRR with me then please do it on the RRR site. This is a BMR site and let's stay focused. The question you need to ask is why anyone feels the need or desire to bring this up. Few people know the whole story - my lawyers at Carter Ruck have most of it. Now back to BMR...where is our AGM?
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
Now a quick note for Stuee on iii... Calm down dear....and please stop spreading muck...If you have questions about the Watch....just ask...I am not an authorised spokesperson for the atch...there are only 3 of those...so what i say causes angst everywhere (just ask laffer) ..what i will say is this: 1. We have mooted the idea of the watch nominating a NED to oversee shareholder interests - and indeed, i aised this in correspondene with AB myself last week; 2. However, we do not have a candidate in mind and there is some debate runnning as to how we might find s candidate acceptable to the Board; 3. In truth AB was noncommittal so I don't know if the idea has legs or is dead in the water. But the motivation is simple - the protection of shareholder interests. So why all the song and dance?
Bugle
07 Apr 2015
wow Scotch. That called a halt to the proceedings. |Seems tweedledum and tweedledee are having to regroup and plan another angle of attack. Lets just hope that MA and ALL his 'disciples' spend al long time paying for all the suffering they have caused some good honest people. No wonder they want the watch smashed
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
sorry - typos ...should read..i took the liberty of sharing the substance....
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
LJC- I too share the substance of a direct call I held on Thursday evening with Alex B. We spoke at length and i expressed concerns on the mooted consolidation and he gave me his thinking and reasoning...I duly shared with the Watch and then on this board. I certainly have nothing to gain from this information - I can hardly be somehow trading shares....but if you posses a phone you too can call Ab and ask
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
Asto the impact of 10:1, theoretically, the price should be 10x per share with1/10 the shares incirculation but it doesn't necessarily work that way...i suspect a huge part will be determined by how much good news, if any, AB can package around the news and any positive sentiment he can recreate...
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
Well, you can believe me or not - or you can call AB yourself and ask him directly. He did not say when the 10:1 would happen, though I rather suspect he would use the opportunity of the agm to get all the bad news on the table. You'll find ABs cell phone number on the bottom of each RNS..Call, ask, check - facts not ignorance please
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
Finally. To my knowledge no-one's identity has been compromised. Letters were sent to shareholders off the register obtained legally and the use of the register is a proper purpose. The only person in the shareholder alliance with detailed information on individual holdings is the person who acquired the register. And to be clear and to ensure compliance with the DPA -that I believe is how it should be. All founder members have volunteered proof of their holdings to each other but they deserve the same anonymity beyond this proof of bona fides as anyone else
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
LJC - I have been publicly & privately critical of AB - largely due to ambiguity & missing deadlines. But i remain ambivalent. I have had private communication with AB and, for now, i will suspend judgement and take him at his word. And two parts of the word are: 1 Expect a 10:1 proposed dilution 2: Expect wainwright & Furman to still be directors up to the AGM
scotchoverice
07 Apr 2015
Thing is, I don't understand Ritter's problem - or anyone else's problems. We have all trusted management before, and look how that turned out. So now the suggestion is we doff our caps and let the masters do whatever they think best and we just suck it up again. Fankly, I don't know what can be achieved, but I'd rather try than criticise those who are trying. So Ritter, whoever you are - "get back in your own box pal"..if you have nothing constructive to add, then you have nothing constructive to add. Plain and simple.
