Scancell Holdings Live Discussion

Live Discuss Polls Ratings
Page

kreature 17 May 2016

Re: Down AGAIN Perhaps another tweet from the Cheshire cat would help? Strange, no early 2016 modi trial?

kipngail 17 May 2016

Re: Down AGAIN Wasn't there some Mother 'hero' mock 'super-trader' who was not long ago, 'mopping-up' all he could lay his hands on @ circa 20 / 22 p.....in spite of ALL the 'insightful warnings' to WAIT ??? The wise investor might consider that = Somewhat WASTEFUL Mind you, Not as WASTEFUL as the 'pump bait' attempt to trick folks by 'chucking-in ' CLUB cash to the off-key tune of 55,5oo shares @ 44p.Now that WAS .....WASTEFUL..Is the ' gathering at the Devon Arms' being 'penciled-in' as the next trHYPE focus,,,,in the event of the let-down should *WE* see an ' ASCO fiasco ' ???*WE* seem to have quite a number of 'gatherings' that have all been hailed by the trHYPERS - PRIOR to the ACTUAL events, as 'CERTAIN to set the world alight' .... Only for them to 'pass like ships in the night'..Still, *WE* might expect that EVEN the trHYPE gang 'might' get something RIGHT.... one day.Unfortunately, for the trHYPE swallowers on 60% + 'paper losses'--- They haven't got ANYTHING RIGHT yet.

Aimbig 17 May 2016

Down AGAIN As the SP falls, the club are now seriously under water and are gathering at the Devon Arms for a strategic TrHYPE review.Ratshitwriter today claims that avoiding a mega deal was a seriously clever thing to do. After all, who would want a £15 SP when you could have it at 15p?

kipngail 16 May 2016

ASCO yourself 4 - Where next??? with a couple of weeks for the trHYPERS to 'build up' this 'event' ..... IF, as with all other previous 'dry wells of expectaions',,,,, What / When / Where, subsequent 'gimmick' - will the trHYPERS try to persuade everyone / THEMSELVES to THEN focus on, as the next 'promised land' event.???

Aimbig 13 May 2016

SCOA That's what it should be.Scancell Cant Organise Anything.Late with the trial results.Very late with a licensing dealExtremely late with the sale of the Company.Or was it all lies?????

kipngail 13 May 2016

ASCO yourself 3 The INVERSE trHYPER ratcliffewriterToday 10:50" Interesting the price guessing has restarted - and to be honest it's fair enough to contemplate again, >>>except that last time it was jeered at by ***the doomies *** (how wrong they seem to have been) and also it was lower than it is now! <<< ".Here AGAIN *WE* see the 'self- deception' / BLATANT 'deception' of the FAILED BUY, BUY, BUY scam trHYPERS, aimed at the unwary.WHO might the ACTUAL ***doomies' be ??? and..." WHERE / WHO has - "(how wrong they seem to have been) and also it was lower than it is now! " - been repeatedly SHOWN to have been WRONG ???,ANYONE, who chose to ignore the trHYPE, and ACCURATELY predicted the time-scales, and S P movements here.... CANNOT be 'painted' as *** the DOOMIES' here,,, cos those more balanced / steady folks were PREPARED for the present 'situation' ERGO = NO DOOM / GLOOM for them..The ONLY people who CAN be feeling any * DOOM / GLOOM * .... ARE in fact , anyone 'daft' enough to have 'followed / swallowed' the trHYPERS unsound CLAIMS of expectations. { And, disregarding, the CLEAR WARNINGS of the WISER observers,,,, acted upon it .. },SO = As to who the 'implied' 'finger pointing' that the ASTUTE investor { Not sitting on 'painful' OVER 60% "paper losses" } indicates, that the ACTUAL people 'suffering' and feeling DOOMY / GLOOMY... are in fact = The manufacturors of the unsound trHYPE.ERGO = The INVERSE of the trHYPERS 'version' of REALITY........AGAIN.As always, Common Sense prevails. { Eventually }

kipngail 12 May 2016

ASCO yourself 2 Unfunny Mother ratcliffewriterObservationToday 14:24"And remember the comment RG made at the meeting so badly reported by Tosh (may he rest in peace) - that he had had the C(ure) word mentioned to him ">>>>I seem to recall ALSO mentioned at some long since 'camera op' , that he { R G } had received a 'correspondence' THAT DAY, from some-one 'at that time - unknown to him', which he would 'follow-up' on when time allowed.This was ALSO met with the usual 2 + 2 = 5 by the trHYPE CLUB>>>>So, is it reasonable to ask if ANYONE has 'heard' ANYTHING MORE of this "contact".Did ANYTHING come of it ???Or, was it just a 'Wrong number' ???Strange how things get lost / forgotten in the mists of time{ Like £1 a share on the cards today... and .... NO risk here ... etc, etc }

kipngail 12 May 2016

ASCO yourself Here are some Mother F***er Fallout Forum FACTS to ponder on =Yet again this 'next event' is being 'hailed' as the 'latest' { in a long line of FALSE hopes}REALITY = Far from being the 'gateway' to 'untold good fortune'.... The S P now stands at HALF it was this time last year --- NEEDS to rise over 100% just to get back to where the S P sat prior to this 'breakthrough' event last year.... falling steadily ever since.>>>The Mother F***er Fallout ForumGiven the numbers of folks who have been 'cleansed' / left of their own accord / just 'carn't be RRRRsed.... What can be 'gathered' ???REALITY =The 'childish insults' CON tinueThe abuse of anyone who posts an ALTERNATIVE VIEW to the trHYPER sect CON tinuesYET, those who run this site STILL pander to the 'sect'.Given that those who 'operate' this ???? do so as a 'business' to attract folks to 'purchase their wares' / advertisers anon, anon..... With people LEAVING / being driven away from / turning backs on,,, their site in DROVES, due to the CON stant { lack of } behaviour of the GLUM CLUB trHYPERS ,,,,,,Does it make SOUND business sense to 'pander to' the GLUM CLUB trHYPERS, so that in effect, ONLY the GLUM CLUB trHYPERS remain, on a 'barren wasteland' ???ANY well reasoned observer can see their efforts to ramp up this 'investment' via the trHYPE has FAILED miserably.... { AGAIN = s p NEEDS to rise 100% just to get back to one year ago...despite ALL the empty trHYPE ALLOWED to be published UNHINDERED } >>>>>>>> so why do they persist in 'backing' the GLUM CLUB trHYPERS RELIGOUSLY ???Some might ASCO- is there more here than meets the eye ???

kipngail 11 May 2016

Knowlsey - global warming - the link THINK ABOUT IT"RE: Not looking good hereTue 14:34J53 - if you google scancell, besides the website obviously, you either come here, ADFVN or iii.>>> III is just weird with a couple of guys who clearly were scorned here previously and now just rant about it in weird code - to the average person looking for the first time they just think nutters. <<<.Several years ago, a 'sensible' debate took place between 'a TOP' global [ Man made} warming advocate scientist' and Lord MoncktonThe TOP 'scientist set out to PROVE that Monckton was WRONG- because the 'DATA' showed this....Monckton argued that the 'DATA' was WRONG> Being a 'TOP' scientist, the TOP scientist ,over a three year period, CHECKED the DATA on which the case FOR {Man made} 'global warming' was based.>He has just / is about to, publish a 'paper' in which his findings show Monckton was RIGHT all along... That the 'DATA' that was the 'cornerstone' on which the FOR {Man made} 'global warming was built.... WAS INDEED incorrect..Will this information be passed on to the world at large ???If not- ask yourselves = WHY NOTUnless one thinks the {Man made} global warmers' have a 'hidden agenda'.Is this 'Keep 'em quiet' scenario being repeated here with the {sitting on a 60+% 'paper LOSS } trHYPERS.>>>>Perhaps the " III is just weird with a couple of guys who just rant about it in weird code" - MESSAGE is 'Too intelligent' for some to handle.BUTThose - III is just weird with a couple of guys who just rant about it in weird code" - WARNING of the DANGERS of the BUY, BUY, BUY scammers,,,, and to take in the REALITY =Like Monckton, Were, as the S P { Which IS ??? } shows, RIGHT all along

kipngail 10 May 2016

Re: Mother's Qualifications P S And these losers think the ASTUTE are 'the nutters'GUFFAW

kipngail 10 May 2016

Mother's Qualifications Old Mother Jeremy53RE: Not looking good hereToday 14:53" And then you come here, the last bastian of semblance (or as close to it) and there's a guy posting a negative view and you attacking his physical appearance "***1. I've been here rather longer than you have so the "then you come here" comment doesn't really impress me ** BUT= BETTER STILL2.>>> I spent a long period in the vanguard of those trying to rid this board of the nutters and derampers and I believe the way it is now is in no small part down to my efforts along with several others of which you were not one "<<<??????Perhaps, if more ATTENTION to one's investments was paid, other than 'playing "enforcer" for the 'out of pocket' trHYPE clubbers,,,, MAYBE, *WE* might not witness 'statements of distress',,, such as this one made recently by this "VAN GUARD " =Mother Jerry-tanWHEN THE SP was HIGHER at16.125p mid*** For the record I feel pretty positive about Scancell and still hold 250k-odd shares despite currently sitting on a near 60% paper loss *** . I shall not be selling any time soon, that's the level of my confidence. ".REALLY.... So, what's the "paper loss' just now then 'VAN GUARD' ???

kreature 10 May 2016

Knowlesi Surely Knowlesi should be banned from LSE for being realistic, and for daring to have a different opinion to Sht7?

kipngail 05 May 2016

Mother's intellect "ratcliffewriterRE: Morning Chelsea ..Today 110I know the board is a bit quiet since the binmen took the rubbish away, " .This from a ???? who aligns himself 'intellectually' to Elsie, who, in turn, displays such worldly insights, that he { Elsie } firmly believes that 'The Brenner Pass' MUST relate to a 'football rule', in which, if the goal-keeper picks up, or handles the ball from a 'Brenner Pass' back, it results in a 'free-kick to the opposition.No doubt Elsie would 'jump to the conclusion', in Elsie's usual; manner of 2 + 2 = 5,,,, that 'Brenner' was probably, the first player punished for this offence - Ergo= The Brenner Pass.= FACT.To most 'Non- intellectually Challenged' folks, as these two are, One might opine that, ====The binmen appear to have taken away 'All the good stuff from the property... And left the rubbish'

kipngail 05 May 2016

Re: Excitement Good morning K et al."Why is the timeline so slippery?"2013, 2016, and now 2017 is being 'factored in'.What can be observed from the 'timelines' ???2013 - The trHYPE was in 'full flush' = Unquestionable "claims" of prices to be in the £££ s"£1 a share today",,,"£12 by Christmas { and they must do this - COS IT'S THE LAW } "Ect, Ect ... The 'levels' of trHYPE were 'off the scale'NONE have shown to have been CORRECT.2016 - An S P of less than 16p AND little or NO interest in the 'near term'... Certainly , NO interest by investors / markets, in ANYTHING the 'dwindling band of trHYPERS' have to say.In fact, the trHYPERS have very little remaining to say..2017 - Now being 'claimed' as an 'EXPECTED scenario'.Odd, is it not, how, as *WE* see, the 'timelines retreat' matches the decline in the MFFF trHYPE content. { Which, as history proves, has all but 'dried up' } due mainly to the FACT, that EVERYONE can clearly see, EVERYTHING the trHYPERS claimed has PROVED to have been WRONG...... BUT..... also FALSE at the time they were making their MISLEADING 'claims'.Figures / MATHS don't LIEWords { especially empty ones } DO

kreature 05 May 2016

Excitement When is the 2013 trade-sale going to happen?When is the early 2016 trial going to begin?Why is the timeline so slippery?

Page