Clean Air Power Live Discussion

Live Discuss Polls Ratings Documents
Page

staffai 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? maybe......just ?

Ewan Hoosami 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? As a long-suffering TRK holder I've learned never to rely on government pronouncements or emissions targets to help provide momentum as things progress at such a glacial pace. As for the patents, there's always more than one way to skin the proverbial cat and it would take real expertise to appraise their true value, which I certainly don't possess.Having said all that, a huge late buy and finishing on the day's high sets up at least one more exciting day. Good luck if you're still in - takes nerve to buy or even hold after a quick 300% rise.

Iclaude 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? I strongly disagree. The intellectual rights for the patents alone would be worth £10m as countries view exhaust gases as a primary cause of pollution in crowded cities, etc. China, in particular, suffers heavily from air pollution and places like Mexico City are dreadful at times. Not to mention world agreements for reducing carbon footprints and global warning, etc.. Obama is currently taking on the coal industry in America, now that fracking for gas has given him an option. It's the way the world is viewing these technologies and CAP is a company at the forefront of technology to reduce emissions. I don't know whether you have noticed but The EU has already locked new diesel goods vehicles and cars into reducing toxic exhaust emissions, particularly CO2. £10m is a bargain price and highly achievable.

Ewan Hoosami 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? Irresponsible to talk about 4 or 5p/share.Net assets at 31/12/14 were £5.1m, including £2.1m cash which we know is running out. 4p per share would give a market cap of just over £10m.Is it more likely that CAP is heading for administration or that a bidding war will erupt for a company facing lack of demand for its products and at the mercy of OEMs and their timings?How lucky are you feeling?

Iclaude 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? There is nothing wrong with the technology but market forces have conspired to make the idea less profitable, albeit that adoption of these engines are assisting in pollution control and energy saving. It would be a good buy to have at this time. Oil can only rise in time and I can forsee this coming back in a different name. 5p would be a fair price but 4p would be a bargain.

arborman 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? Good shout yesterday alltold

casey5521 05 Aug 2015

Re: JUST MAYBE? I think 5p+ is wishful thinkingLet's start with 1p+ and see how we get onGLAKC

alltold9 04 Aug 2015

JUST MAYBE? Just maybe there is an offer on its way, after all the base company is sound, and with a financial boost it could be very successful. Here is hoping for 5p+

damnit 04 Aug 2015

A not unexpected dead cat bounce and some speculation on the value of the patents has made for a quick profit for the brave. Anyone else who has held shares for longer than 5 days is suffering serious losses. This cat has already used it's 9 lives and is hemorrhaging money with no sign whatsoever of making any profit for years. For that reason...I'm out!

damnit 30 Jul 2015

The company lost over £6m last year and has a market cap of just £0.8m. To think these shares have gone from 120p to 0.25p in less than 10 years ago. Shame...

damnit 28 Jul 2015

the Board can provide no assurance that significant value will be returned to shareholders (the Board are are now certain your shares are about to become worthless). Doh!

Iclaude 15 Jul 2015

RNS re KPMG 15 July 2015 Clean Air Power Limited("Clean Air Power" or the "Group" Update on the Review of Strategic Options Clean Air Power (AIM: CAP), the global leader in the development and delivery of compression-ignited natural gas systems and software for heavy duty vehicles, today provides an update on the review of the Group's strategic options announced on 23rd June 2015 that is being led by KPMG Corporate Finance, as announced on 26th June 2015. In response to KPMG's work to secure the long term financial stability of the Group, a number of parties have expressed an interest in acquiring all or a part of the Group. Such interest may or may not lead to an offer being made for all or a part of the Group. The Board, as advised by KPMG, are in the process of evaluating these expressions of interest as a way to provide long term financial stability and maximise the value of the Group within the constraints of the Group's current financial position. John Pettitt, Chief Executive of Clean Air Power, said: "As we explained in our announcement on 23rd June, the decision by our partner on the South East Asian MicroPilot program to extend the first phase rather than proceed to the second and full production phase, as we had expected, has put pressure on the Group's short term cash flows; a position which has been exacerbated by falling oil prices impacting sales of our Genesis-EDGE products in the US and Russia. KPMG have been extensive in their work to secure the long term financial stability of the Group and we will continue to work with KPMG over the next few weeks to deliver the best solution for all stakeholders, recognising that the Group's short term financial position may act as a constraint on our ability to maximise the value of the Group." For further information, please contact: Clean Air PowerJohn Pettitt, Chief ExecutiveNeill Skinner, Chief Financial Officer

Iclaude 15 Jul 2015

RNS possible takeover KPMG are looking to find a buyer for CAP by the looks of things.

alfa-spider 20 Jun 2015

US propose emissions cut This is a good opportunity - hope they can capitalise on thisUS regulators have proposed new plans for lorries and vans to cut emissions as part of a drive to cut pollution.The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants the industry to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 24% by 2027 through building more efficient models.It says the new standards would reduce overall fuel costs by $170bn and oil consumption by up to 1.8bn barrels over a vehicle's lifetime.The EPA estimates it would cut total emissions by about 1bn metric tons.Medium and heavy-duty vehicles account for about 20% of US gas emissions but make up only 5% of road traffic, according to government calculations."These efficiency standards are good for the environment and the economy," said the US Transport Secretary Anthony Foxx in a statement."When trucks use less fuel, shipping costs go down. It's good news all around, especially for anyone with an online shopping habit," he continued.'Unreliable'Gina McCarthy, chief of the Environmental Protection Agency, added that the rules would deliver "big time" on President Obama's call to cut carbon pollution. She said they would save consumers, business and lorry-owners money as well as helping to protect Americans' health.The industry body, the American Trucking Association (ATA), said it was broadly supportive of the move but that it was concerned that it might lead to new technology being used before it was ready."We believe this rule could result in the deployment of certain technologies that do not fully recognise the diversity of our industry and could prove to be unreliable, said Glen Kedzie of the ATA."This unreliability could slow not only adoption of these technologies, but the environmental benefits they aim to create." The rules would be phased in, beginning with models built in 2021 in order to give manufacturers time to adjust. 2027 they should all fully meet the standards.There will be a two-month public consultation period with a view to a final version being implemented next year.

priceisright 15 May 2015

... From More about us document:"The Group has secured a deal with one of the world’s largest truck manufacturers to develop aMicroPilot engine for the South East Asian market which is scheduled to enter production in 2017. This is a two-stage program supported by Ricardo plc (“Ricardo” under a wider co-operation agreement between Clean Air Power and Ricardo, with a project gateway decision in April 2015."

Page